Tattoo RFID

Bill Ray reported on The Register in January 2007 that a Saint Louis company known as Somark Innovations has successfully tested a new kind of radio frequency identification (RFID) medium. An identification number can be stored in a tattoo that is injected from an array of needles onto animals such as cows, mice and rats.

The RFID’s number can then be read from more than a meter away using a proprietary high frequency reader.

Existing tags are either expensive or can be torn out from animals.

Somark’s next market after animals will be to identify military personnel, meaning the tattoo also works on humans.

Again as evidenced, the last days are truly here.

“And it puts under compulsion all persons, the small and the great, and the rich and the poor, and the free and the slaves, that they should give these a mark in their right hand or upon their forehead, and that nobody might be able to buy or sell except a person having the mark, the name of the wild beast or the number of its name. Here is where wisdom comes in: Let the one that has intelligence calculate the number of the wild beast, for it is a man’s number; and its number is six hundred and sixty-six.” – Revelation 13:16-18, New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures

Links:

The Register – Cattle branding comes to the 21st Century: High-tech tattoo more than a pretty picture
<URL:http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/01/16/rfid_tattoo/>

Share

Identity Cards, Phone Calls and You

UK’s Prime Minister Tony Blair is defending for the nation’s plan to have identity (ID) cards for non-EU immigrants from year 2008. Similar ID cards will be compulsory for locals from 2010. Although not considered as a comprehensive solution to combat illegal immigration, welfare fraud, and terrorism, setting up the identity system, known as the National Identity Register, will improve protection and enable effective checks, Blair said.

This news ought to cause a few seat adjustments from the civil rights groups.

The Register may store about 49 types of information, see the link “What data will ID cards store?” below. The most accurate identification tokens that will be recorded will be fingerprints and other biometric information, which I believe will be at least the iris and facial photograph. Multiple-token recognition is statistically accurate, down to the one in hundreds of million odds.

Malaysia and Singapore have both adopted national ID cards for their citizens. The set of data that is contained in the card is similarly large. Fields such as addresses, race, religion, signature, physical attributes, and biometrics are stored; in the case of Malaysia, on a 32KB computer chip. Cards are issued for newborns, and it is an offence not to bear the ID card outside of the citizens’ homes (see links below).

The national ID card is meant for bringing products and services to the electronic form of identification for purposes of consumption or access privileges. It is supposed to combat identity forgery and enable effective security checks. At the same time, the card abolishes civil privacy and makes the citizens vulnerable to bribery, identity theft, and breaking laws that were created just for the card system.

Again in these two countries, mobile phone numbers and their interconnections are recorded in a main system that the mobile telcos have to route to. This is a regulation or law of their respective media or communications ministry, created to fight against crimes such as terrorism. Singapore is the first country to implement such a mobile phone call “brokering” system affectionately known as the mobile number portability system, Malaysia is in the pre-implementation stages. All calls that you have made using your mobile phone can be recalled from the system, including pre-paid numbers since these need to be pre-registered with your identity.

Big brother is watching you. Be a good lemming, mate, or don’t get caught! :)

Links:

BBC News – Blair defends identity card plan
<URL:http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/6120220.stm>

BBC News – What data will ID cards store?
<URL:http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/4630045.stm>

Wikipedia – British national identity card
<URL:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_national_identity_card>

Wikipedia – MyKad
<URL:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MyKad>

The Star – NRD (National Registry Department) warns of RM20,000 fine or three years’ jail
<URL:http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2006/7/7/nation/14765105&sec=nation&focus=1>

Singapore Police Force – Information On Police Procedures
<URL:http://www.spf.gov.sg/epc/procedures/intro.htm>

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Share

Child Abuse and Child Murder Cases

Following on the topic of child abuse (see Lau Jun Wei), I found a website called “Parents Behaving Badly”, maintained by Jay Andrew Allen. Warning: if you are put off by reading numerous cases of babies and children hurt and killed by their parents and caretakers, carefully consider if you want to visit this site.

Most of the stories show us how foolish and irresponsible people can be when a young life is supposed to be cared for by them. The children are needlessly dragged into these people’s fights, disrespectful behaviour, or twisted mentalities. Parents leave their babies in cars. Crying babies are strangled. Kids are starved to death. Parents performing immoral acts with their children. Fathers taking his children’s and his own lives.

These people have no love for their children and do not deserve them. These people, known and unknown, must be punished and removed from society. We must not ignore their sad and sickening crimes, and be active in helping prevent future cases from happening.

This is a list of the most significant cases:

Most Mental Parent – Adoptive Mother Guilty of Striking Son, Letting Him Die
<URL:http://www.parentsbehavingbadly.com/2006/10/28/adoptive-mother-guilty-of-striking-son-letting-him-die/>

Most Violent Mom – Mom Convicted of Killing Baby by Bouncing Him off A Wall
<URL:http://www.parentsbehavingbadly.com/2006/10/24/mom-convicted-of-killing-baby-by-bouncing-him-off-a-wall/>

Most Stupid Parent – Baby Drowns in Mom’s Vomit Bucket
<URL:http://www.parentsbehavingbadly.com/2006/09/23/baby-drowns-in-moms-vomit-bucket/>

Most Cold-Blooded Parent – Mom Teaches Teen Daughter The Basics of Burying Dead Babies
<URL:http://www.parentsbehavingbadly.com/2006/09/02/mom-teaches-teen-daughter-the-basics-of-burying-dead-babies/>

Most Negligent Parents – Two Toddlers Scalded to Death
<URL:http://www.parentsbehavingbadly.com/2005/10/08/two-toddlers-scalded-to-death/>

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Share